In-progress report on Doctor Atomic
“100,000 people dead by the end of the year.” “But Oppenheimer didn’t mean for them to die. There was that document where he advocates a display of force to make an impression, though, right? What about that?” “ ‘My sister described this bright flash of greens and purples.’ ‘Was there anything unusual about her reaction?’ ‘My sister is blind.’ ” “Is it considered genocide when that many people are targeted for destruction? When is it not legal war, but illegal genocide?”
Those were my barely conscious thoughts at 5:00 this
morning, when I woke up thinking about the atomic bomb. The quotation of the
sister comes from a documentary in which a woman who driving through
Doctor Atomic opens at Lyric Opera in a couple weeks, on December 14, and I’ve been doing my critical homework on it for an advance article that’ll come out before the opening, along with a review. I have the 500 pages of score; I have a live recording sent courtesy of Boosey & Hawkes. I read the Pulitzer Prize-winning biography of Robert Oppenheimer by Martin Sherwin and Kai Bird; I have interviews with the director and author of the libretto, Peter Sellars, and baritone Gerald Finley, who plays Oppenheimer, committed to tape. I went to a rehearsal. On Sellars’s recommendation, I watched Jon Else’s documentary about the Manhattan Project The Day after Trinity. I read most of Richard Rhodes’s The Making of the Atomic Bomb, and will begin his new Arsenals of Folly: The Making of the Nuclear Arms Race, which deals with the decades after World War II, tonight. And yet, due to the subject matter and the opera itself, I feel under an enormous strain that’s different than any other preparation or study I’ve done.
I’m usually speechless when I try to
describe what I’ve been doing. I’ll explain to someone how John Adams uses
Baroque forms and formulas in Oppenheimer’s aria at the end of Act I, and then have
to stop talking. The descending “sighing” motif appears in that aria, “Batter
My Heart, Three Person’d God,” and
Something similar happened while watching the documentary.
The destructive force of the bomb that was tested and those that destroyed
The opera deals with the days leading up to the test
explosion in New Mexico. The scientists are tired, and on edge. The music has a
density worthy of Sibelius, or even Wagner, married with a propulsiveness that’s
reminiscent of Stravinsky, but with explosive quality that’s entirely
I try to make sense of all of this, and wonder how Adams and Sellars lived with this history for so long, and maintained their stability. It makes me tired, and depressed, and is there waiting for me when I wake up. I don’t like thinking about it, and yet that is precisely what we have to do in order to have some idea of the era we live in. Those bombs aren’t going away, and more and more countries are developing them. The music has an urgency befitting the subject. I have to put my head down again.